https://wiki.warmahordes.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User_talk%3ARiversUser talk:Rivers - Revision history2026-04-28T07:38:20ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.1https://wiki.warmahordes.net/index.php?title=User_talk:Rivers&diff=11627&oldid=previmported>Warmachine University contributors: Imported from HTTrack HTML mirror2018-05-25T00:26:28Z<p>Imported from HTTrack HTML mirror</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><html><br />
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="ROF">ROF</span></h3><br />
<p>I see you made a template for ROF. I don't think that is necessary, we're not trying to copy every single aspect of the rules on to this wiki. We can't, either, due to copyright. <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 15:41, 1 July 2016 (EDT)<br />
</p><br />
<ul><li> Ok, no problem on that. It felt like it would be useful since there are a few different variations of ROF. That way model pages could be consistent across factions, but if we prefer not to be that specific, it makes sense. <a href="/index.php?title=User:Rivers" title="User:Rivers">Rivers</a> (<strong class="selflink">talk</strong>) 15:47, 1 July 2016 (EDT)</li></ul><br />
<dl><dd><dl><dd> There's probably no harm in saying ROF 2,3 etc. But I don't think we need to explain what ROF is each time, as well. <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 03:14, 2 July 2016 (EDT)</dd></dl></dd></dl><br />
<h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Mirage">Mirage</span></h3><br />
<p>I see you took the text of Apparition out of Mirage, and replaced it with a link instead. My rule of thumb for "abilities that give other abilities" is that the text should go in, unless the given ability is covered in the core rulebook (like Boundless Charge giving Pathfinder). <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 20:16, 13 July 2016 (EDT)<br />
</p><br />
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Legion_edits">Legion edits</span></h2><br />
<p>When you went through and put the "Infobox" on all the Legion pages, you deleted some content that was already there. For instance the Grotesques, Scythen, and Neraph. I assume this was on accident? <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 17:07, 3 November 2016 (EDT)<br />
</p><p>It was actually partially intentional, I also was rearranging the headings to be internally consistent with other Legion entries (the user or users who added that info did it before I got around to formalizing that); additionally I only had time yesterday to just fix the formatting for some of them. There were a few that still had info under the headings that I incorporated/elaborated at the same time as redoing the headings. I just got on now to finish the process (of reincorporating the existing content) for those model pages you mentioned since I can still view the content via the edit history. --<a href="/index.php?title=User:Rivers" title="User:Rivers">Rivers</a> (<strong class="selflink">talk</strong>) 14:07, 4 November 2016 (EDT)<br />
</p><br />
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Vayl_and_Bethyane">Vayl and Bethyane</span></h2><br />
<p>Why are you just flat-out deleting whole sections that someone else has written? I don't play Legion, so I don't know ... is there something wrong with those tricks, like a rule that the original author misunderstood? Or are you just deleting them because you think it's a stupid idea to try/bad advice/etc ? If the later, I would rather you move it into the "Tips and Tricks" section rather than delete it. (That's sort of the purpose of providing a "Tricks" section, to 'quarantine' any stupid ideas). <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 16:07, 21 December 2016 (EST)<br />
</p><br />
<ul><li>These are tricks that are invalidated as per the latest errata yesterday - the restriction of melee range to front arc, and no more power attacks vs friendly models. Also I was the one who originally included those tricks when they functioned before the errata anyways. <a href="/index.php?title=User:Rivers" title="User:Rivers">Rivers</a> (<strong class="selflink">talk</strong>) 10:48, 22 December 2016 (EST)</li></ul><br />
<ul><li><ul><li> Fair enough. <a href="/index.php?title=User:Juckto" title="User:Juckto">juckto</a> (<a href="/index.php?title=User_talk:Juckto" title="User talk:Juckto">talk</a>) 15:15, 22 December 2016 (EST)</li></ul></li></ul><br />
<!-- <br />
NewPP limit report<br />
Cached time: 20220728073317<br />
Cache expiry: 86400<br />
Dynamic content: false<br />
CPU time usage: 0.010 seconds<br />
Real time usage: 0.012 seconds<br />
Preprocessor visited node count: 14/1000000<br />
Preprocessor generated node count: 20/1000000<br />
Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes<br />
Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes<br />
Highest expansion depth: 2/40<br />
Expensive parser function count: 0/100<br />
--><br />
<!-- <br />
Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template)<br />
100.00% 0.000 1 - -total<br />
--><br />
<!-- Saved in parser cache with key warmachi_mw26-mwjg_:pcache:idhash:4188-0!*!0!!en!*!* and timestamp 20220728073317 and revision id 27253<br />
--><br />
</html></div>imported>Warmachine University contributors